Welcome to the ultimate waterjet forum, WaterjetGroup.com!
This forum will give you access to participate in discussions and attain resources via our vibrant waterjet community . This discussion board is intended for any waterjet user but the majority of the moderators are associates of Flow International Corporation. We will attempt to make this community an unbiased source of information regarding general waterjet topic areas. If you are a registered Flow Waterjet customer and require in-depth product support, please visit FlowParts.com. font>
Hello, what is your typical settings for flowcut with regards to dwell times for jet on/abrasive on and jet off/abrasive off? I want to be able to cut the fastest, does the waterjet need to dwell for a few seconds between jet and abrasive.
No there is really no reason to dwell for a few seconds between water and abrasive. We typically run a zero dwell for water on and a .5 second for abrasive on. The dwell made need to be increased if you are cutting at 100%. On the off side we run a .5 second for abrasive off and .75 - 1 second for water off.
Waterjet Tech 1, do you find components life to decrease with zero dwell for jet/abrasive on and .5 abrasive off / .75-1 water off?
I plan to do this because i find the dwell time a waste... i'm currently running 2sec jet on / 1.5sec abrasive on and 1.5sec abrasive off / 2sec jet off.
cmn, what are you cutting to use such long dwells? i have basically all the same settings as the tech. and the only reason to really have a longer dwell on anything is to clear the abrasive from the feed line to avoid clogs. besides that you can make things alot faster. especially if your cutting looser tolerances. holes have posed the biggest obstacle to making the dwells TOO short for me. ha ha. just my 2 cents
*sigh* You'd have to work here to see why. Everything's approximate, except for the dimensions of the finished pieces. Since we're cutting stainless plate, the dwell times don't figure heavily into the actual cut time. Average cut time for a piece is about 10 min. Last nights pieces were a 2,000 minute piece on one machine, several 30 min pieces on another machine, and lots of 8 min. pieces on the third machine. All things considered, we allow lots of room for dwell, to avoid any problems that might crop up. That way, we have time to deal with the rest of the problems that DO crop up. :)
No we do not find component life to decrease with these settings. The off dwell may seem short for some, but I can not recall a clog since going to these settings about 4 years ago. It may leave a small bit of abrasive in the hose but it is minimal. What I like the best is the pierce is alot cleaner since the jet starts to move right allowing for less spray during the pierce. There will be the occasions were dwells need to increased due orifice size and/or abrasive size.
I cut a lot of rubber belting. And find that having a zero dwell for water on creates a very quick and efficient pierce. Before when we tried with a longer dwell we where getting a pocket or bubble of water in between the layers of belting and rubber. On the 3/4" belting the bubbles could get large enough to damage the mixing tube.
Please note, the views and recommendations expressed by employees of Flow or it's partners on this website do not necessarily represent those of Flow International Corporation. For more information on this site's Terms of Use , please visit the DXF Copyright and Community Guidelines pages.
Important: Do not upload any DXF's or images without permission unless they consist entirely of content you or your company created.
By clicking "Upload file", you are representing that this DXF or image does not violate the WaterjetGroup.com's forum's Terms of Use and that you own all copyrights to this file or have authorization to upload it.